From: Dale Ireland (direland@drdale.com)
Date: Mon Apr 07 2003 - 00:04:11 EDT
OK, if you compare it to the winradio 1550, the 1550 costs $200 more (60%
more). The 1550 has the same selectivity as the pcr1000. The pcr1000 has
better sensitivity, the pcr1000 has more IF bandwidth selections (the 1550
doesn't have the bandwidth for receiving satellite images like the pcr1000
can). So why spend $200 more?
Dale
>
> At 11:06 06.04.2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >There are some detailed reviews of the PCR1000 and winradio here
> >http://www.strongsignals.net/access/reviews/reviews.cgi
> >The pcr1000 wins almost all the head to head comparisons.
> >Dale
>
> Please do not compare PCR1000 with the internal winradio 1000..
>
> PCR1000 and the external 1550 winradio is the equal.
>
> Winradio is better for ordinary scanning. better for more different types
> of logging etc
>
> PCR1000 is some better on HF and selectivity...
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> PCR-1000 Mailing List
> Post Address: PCR-1000@mailman.qth.net
> Subscribe / Unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pcr-1000
> Mailman FAQ and Users Guide
> http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
_________________________________________________________________
PCR-1000 Mailing List
Post Address: PCR-1000@mailman.qth.net
Subscribe / Unsubscribe:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pcr-1000
Mailman FAQ and Users Guide
http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:00:10 EDT